Journal readers know that ‘Dr.’ Jill Biden is on a tour to sell her new book that we can’t think of too many people who are really interested in reading.
Yes, presidents and first ladies in the past have definitely written books. I get it. But Biden’s term was so unbelievably bad that you would think the family could read the room and just fade into the sunset.
There are bills to pay, and the Bidens are master grifters, so here we are.
But no
The tour started out bad with her claiming she was just so in the dark about her husband’s severe cognitive decline.
Her excuse was so bad even President Trump took a swipe at her.
That’s not making some Democrats happy as the party – already unpopular – gears up for the midterms.
Also, dropping the book now has also forced everyone to revisit all the questions about Democrats trying to run Joe despite his obvious issues
Dems were also unhappy with the way Jill described how it all went down – and some of their critiques were brutal:“I think Jill Biden must have had a stroke herself to think that her husband was up to the job,” said a Democrat who worked as a senior aide in the Biden era.Whoa.“If she can sit back and listen to his constant drivel for over 4 years, she’s the one with real cognitive decline. The fake doctor may want to consider self medication if it took this long to gain some self realization,” the aide said in a jab at the first lady’s insistence on being called “Dr. Jill Biden” for her doctorate in education.
One aide, Andrew Bates, actually commented on the record:
“We didn’t think he had a health issue because they kept on with the schedule
That criticism didn’t sit well with the good ‘Dr.’:
Yikes…”buddy”? Is she aware that all the aides to Cripple Joe could definitely spill some big, fat beans about his term if they were so inclined?
Well, that pushback started immediately after she shat upon Bates:Former Biden people are furious at the First Lady’s comments given how hard Bates worked for the Bidens.“I want to say to Andrew: Call me up, and say it to my face, buddy,” she charged
Former Biden spokesperson @Rodericka goes on the record: “Why are we rehashing years-old scores and clinging to relevancy to sell books about palace intrigue within a wing that doesn’t even exist anymore? Focusing on this instead of the bleak reality Americans have been experiencing in the same time frame is exactly why we lost in 24.”
Former Biden people are furious at the First Lady’s comments given how hard Bates worked for the Bidens.
— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) June 4, 2026
Former Biden spokesperson @Rodericka goes on the record: “Why are we rehashing years-old scores and clinging to relevancy to sell books about palace intrigue within a wing… https://t.co/g8jFFUr04n
Another former Biden WH staffer tells me:
— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) June 4, 2026
“The former First Lady would still be known as the former Second Lady without Andrew Bates.”
Another Biden World insider added: “The former First Lady would still be known as the former Second Lady without Andrew Bates.”
But in reality, the party appears to have learned nothing from the 2024 loss anyway. It keeps doubling down on left-wing loony.
